Source Blending: Paraphrasing, Quoting, and Summarizing - Graduate Writing Center

Nested Applications
GWC - source blending - main content

Source Blending


What is source blending?

Source blending is the skillful incorporation of paraphrasing, quoting, and summarizing source material into your papers, and it takes more practice and structure than throwing bananas, berries, and protein powder into your next smoothie.

For example, let’s say you’ve found a credible source that supports your argument. Now what?

  • Do you paste that passage into your document, surround it with quotation marks, add a citation, and call it a day?
  • Or would it be better to stick to your own words, rephrasing the author’s thoughts in a way that is most suited to your discussion?
  • Do you (or your readers) even need all this verbiage?

For help answering these questions, peruse the links and guidance below.

Short Takes: Citation Principles, Summarizing, Paraphrasing, and Quoting

These Graduate Writing Center video tutorials offer a concise overview of essential source-blending skills:

Source Blending: A Demonstration

Here's an example of the range of ways in which you can employ source blending—in this case, using text from Warren Berger's A More Beautiful Question (New York: Bloomsbury, 2014; citations are in Chicago Author-Date style):

  • Quoting: Warren Berger (2014) suggests that "it can be a relief to know that, in coming up with fresh ideas, we don't have to invent from scratch; we can draw upon what already exists and use that as raw material. The key may lie in connecting those bits and pieces in a clever, unusual, and useful way, resulting in . . . smart recombinations" (103–4).
     
  • Paraphrasing: According to Warren Berger (2014), new ideas are often not products of pure invention, unrelated to anything that has come before, but instead arise from familiar knowledge. The newness of new ideas, he proposes, frequently lies in the way in which they recontextualize and repurpose that familiar knowledge. 
     
  • Summarizing: Although it may seem counterintuitive, one way to create new knowledge is to use what we already know, but use it in a new context or application (Berger 2014).

Note that it's often useful to move back and forth in a single sentence between material from the source (whether summarized, paraphrased, or quoted) and your own language and ideas: 

  • Mixed: Warren Berger (2014) explains that "fresh ideas" might not actually be so fresh (103). Combining pieces of previous knowledge "in a clever, unusual, and useful way" leads to "smart recombinations" that allow old ideas to spark new ones (Berger 2014, 103–104).

How can I learn more about blending sources into my writing?

  • "Paraphrasing and Quoting for All Citation Styles" (Thesis Processing Office (TPO) handout; scroll down) defines summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting, provides guidance on when to choose which technique, and gives examples of best practices and proper formatting.
  • "Plagiarism Prevention 101" (NPS video, ca. 30', from Foundations of Academic Writing) recognizes students' need to cite, quote, paraphrase, and summarize a potentially wide range of sources in their writing and gives tips on using sources to develop better arguments and the basics of avoiding plagiarism.
  • "Summarizing, Paraphrasing, and Quoting: A Guide to Doing it Right!" (Genesee Library video, 14:12) provides guidance on when to paraphrase, summarize, or quote as well as step-by-step instructions on how to (and now not to) paraphrase.

Source Blending Links

Using Signal Phrases

Source Blending and iThenticate

Additional Resources

GWC - all topics list heading

Writing Topics A–Z


This index makes findings topics easy and links to the most relevant page for each item. Please email us at writingcenter@nps.edu if we're missing something!

A-Z content menu

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

A

abbreviations

abstracts

academic writing

acronyms

active voice

adjectives, compound

advisor, selecting and working with

AI

apostrophes

appointment with GWC coaches, how to schedule

argument

article usage

artificial intelligence

assignments, understanding them

audience

return to top

B

body paragraphs

booking an appointment with a GWC coach

brackets, square

brainstorming

return to top

C

capitalization

citations

charts

ChatGPT

citation software

citation styles

clauses

clarity

clustering

coaching, about

coaching, how to schedule

colons

comma splices

commas, FANBOYS

commas, introductory

commas, list

commas, nonessential / nonrestrictive information

commas, Oxford

commas, serial

common knowledge

commonly confused words

compare-and-contrast papers

compound adjectives / modifiers

concision

conclusions

conference presentations

conjunctive adverbs

coordinating conjunctions

copyright and fair use

critical thinking

return to top

D

dangling modifiers

dashes

dependent clauses

dependent marker words

display equations

distance learning

double submission of coursework

drafting

Dudley Knox Library

return to top

E

editing your own work

editing: outside editors

em dash

en dash

equations

exclamation points

executive summary

return to top

F

FANBOYS

FAQs

figures

first person, use of in academic writing

footnotes

fragments

free-writing

return to top

G

generative artificial intelligence (AI)

gerunds

grammar

graphics

graphs

group writing

GWC appointment, how to schedule

return to top

H

homophones

Honor Code, NPS

human subjects research

hyphens

return to top

I

ibid.

incomplete sentences

independent clauses

Institutional Review Board

interviews, conducting

introductions

IRB

iThenticate

return to top

J

Joining the Academic Conversation

return to top

L

LaTeX

library liaisons

lists, syntax of

literature reviews

logic and analysis

return to top

M

M dash

making a GWC appointment

mathematics

memos

methodology

modifiers, compound

modifiers, misplaced

return to top

N

N dash

nominalizations

note-taking

noun clusters

numbers

return to top

O

organization

outlining

Oxford comma

return to top

P

paragraph development

parallelism

paraphrasing

parentheses

parts of speech

passive voice

periods

persuasion

phrases vs. clauses

plagiarism, how to avoid

plagiarism-detection software

plain language

polishing

prepositional phrases

prepositions

pronouns, clarity with

pronouns, grammar of

proofreading

publishing

punctuation

return to top

Q

questionnaires, administering

questions

quotation marks

quoting

return to top

R

Reading with Intent I

Reading with Intent II

redundancies

reference software

reflection papers

research

research guides, discipline-specific

research questions

restrictive vs. nonrestrictive information

reusing papers

reverse outlining

revision

roadmaps

run-on sentences

return to top

S

scheduling a GWC appointment

self-citing

semicolons

sentence fragments

serial comma

signal phrases

significance

so what?

source blending

sources, engaging with / critiquing

sources, evaluating the reliability of

sources, citing

spelling

standard essay structure

STEM / technical writing

Strategic Reading I

Strategic Reading II

style

subject–verb agreement

subjects, grammatical

subordinating conjunctions

summarizing

surveys, administering

return to top

T

tables

teams, writing in

technical writing

tense

that vs. which

thesis advisor, selecting and working with

thesis process overview

Thesis Processing Office (TPO)

thesis proposals: common elements

thesis statements

thesis writing

this, that, these, those

tone, professional

topic sentences

transitions

types of papers

return to top

U

United States or U.S.?

return to top

V

verbs and verb tense

return to top

W

which vs. that

why write?

writer’s block

writing in groups / teams

writing process

return to top

Z

Zotero

return to top